My First Love

Lets rewind time to April 2006, I’m on an uneasy train off to an interview at Downing College, Cambridge. I'd been in London for a few months contemplating paints and pencils as part of my art foundation at Byam Shaw. I’m preparing myself for the classic questions, “who do you aspire to”, “why architecture” etc. I’m frantically looking through this terrible book, a glorified ABC’s of the architectural world. I’m 19 and I don’t have a clue.

What stood out and in this book then, I understand to be fundamental now. Clean lines and space. 5 years later and I can’t shake this one perfect, one genius, fundamentalist. I look to him all the time. I think about him all the time. When I drink and get chatty, I find myself reaching for my phone to prove my point, why he is so wonderful, why it matters, why I think he changed the world. I know there are/were equally adept fish in the sea and I know there’s better and more groundbreaking, but Mies van der Rohe captivated me and I’ve never really gotten over it.

I walked around his national gallery in Berlin, running my fingertips along his plastered surfaces, ignoring the art and admiring the walls - trying desperately to connect. Trying to understand why I felt so emotional in this simple, elegant gallery. I put my excitability down to the thought that one day I might make someone feel like this. I love him.



LUDWIG MIES VAN DER ROHE, NEUE NATIONALGALERIE 1968

SIT ON IT - ICONIC - BARCELONA CHAIR IN THE GALLERY

 

In 1968 the Neue Nationalgalerie in Berlin opened. The steel framed glazed pavilion sits a top the well considered, perfectly lit gallery below. Mies loved a floating building. The gallery is large and breathtaking. In spite of awareness that this building is ageing in the corners, the maturity of Mies' iconic style is prevalent, rejuvenating and, always inspiring. This is architecture standing the test of time. 

California (collectedly) sees Mies as modern. If Mies is modern now, what is our generation? What is modern? More importantly, who is the pioneer of our modern age? I've just finished reading an introduction about modern architecture that was published in the 1930’s. Modern then is modern now. Modernity in architecture is reflected by the technologies available. The process of architecture is assisted greatly by knowing what we can achieve and how. Peter Behrens and his turbine hall, the first modern building of our time? The sudden development and understanding of steel frames and reinforced concrete allowed modern architecture to truly begin. Behrens inspired his apprentice Mies, the way that Mies might inspire us. Or perhaps it is Behrens and Mies that inspire us? If modern architects are the now modern architects, then future of our architectural category is lost. We're losing it to the real modern pioneers, repeating the past and testing safe boundaries. We should naturally turn to what they turned to: technological availability and impeccable taste. What is our architectural era?

PETER BEHRENS, TURBINE HALL 1910



LUDWIG MIES VAN DER ROHE, 860 - 880 LAKESHORE DRIVE 1949



AND I DON'T EVEN LIKE CIGARS



[aside] Cambridge and Anahita didn't gel. At all.

pics courtesy of myself and google

24hr - "military time"

Welcome to America, where the food is bountiful, the lifestyle varies and it's either AM or PM. 

I live with two rad Californian girls. One from the south and one from the north. They do the 4th of July, beers and good times. Super typical. They also do a lot of American-English. Sometimes, obviously, I understand them. Sometimes I don't want to. 

This evening, I learnt about "military time". What is 23:25 to me is incomprehensible to them. They "didn't learn it like that" and they aren't even willing to learn! Flying the flag solo over here for the rest of the world. North California (Nor Cal) is all giggles about how she couldn't remember which numbers meant which time and it's making me laugh, South California (So Cal) is trying to justify herself as to why she doesn't need to know "militarty time" which isn't improving their argument and frustrating me more. The world understands the time, but North America understands something else. Circles went by and we were in them. It's only 2 sets of 11 numbers paired together. Come on! 

After circling around  - hours go by and sadly, it's still being called "military time" and they refuse to understand that military time is used outside of the military. Long live the 24hr clock. 

USA 1 - AC 0

Battle lost. 

(I will be keeping track of our triumphs and failures)

You, hello there

Welcome to (the) LAW. 
We are now, Living Anahitas' World.

I'd like to be ideal and write down everything that I think is worthwhile reading and then at some point, re-reading. It's probably important to remember things from the everyday that you think might not have been important enough to write down. Error. Living Anahitas' World will seek out to note down the noteworthy and the memorable. I will document thoughts I have about architecture and how it is a fundamental part of our world and how ones environment can heavily impact their behaviour - and why cats are cute. (the) LAW will slowly become a doctrine which I will look back on one day and make a collective account of why, what, where, when and who. The blog will be somewhat erratic, indicative of my personality.

There will be thoughts,
There will be stories,
There will be buildings,
There will be architectural greats,
There will be my view of London,
There will be cats,
There will be pictures and there will be good times.